Comments on: A Real Shame http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/05/a-real-shame/ crypto applied to public policy Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:24:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Benlog » I spoke too quickly? http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/05/a-real-shame/#comment-7645 Benlog » I spoke too quickly? Wed, 06 Dec 2006 06:04:13 +0000 http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/05/a-real-shame/#comment-7645 [...] As one astute commenter notes in my previous blog post on the TGDC meeting, a second resolution presented again by Ron Rivest today was accepted, thanks to revisions that grandfathered in existing machines. This is not quite as good as yesterday’s resolution, but it’s still quite good. So I must at the very least take back my harsh words about Stephen Berger, who obviously voted in favor of this new resolution. [...] [...] As one astute commenter notes in my previous blog post on the TGDC meeting, a second resolution presented again by Ron Rivest today was accepted, thanks to revisions that grandfathered in existing machines. This is not quite as good as yesterday’s resolution, but it’s still quite good. So I must at the very least take back my harsh words about Stephen Berger, who obviously voted in favor of this new resolution. [...]

]]> By: nedu http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/05/a-real-shame/#comment-7640 nedu Wed, 06 Dec 2006 03:10:02 +0000 http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/05/a-real-shame/#comment-7640 <i>US ACM Policy Blog</i> “<a href="http://www.acm.org/usacm/weblog/index.php?p=444" rel="nofollow">TGDC Reverses Course, Finishes Meeting</a>”:<blockquote>[T]he Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) did revisit the software independent proposal during today’s session. It was the first item, and by unanimous consent a revised resolution was approved [...]</blockquote> US ACM Policy Blog “TGDC Reverses Course, Finishes Meeting”:
[T]he Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) did revisit the software independent proposal during today’s session. It was the first item, and by unanimous consent a revised resolution was approved [...]

]]>