<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Felten on Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/</link>
	<description>crypto applied to public policy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>Eric,

I've always found you VoteHere folks to be far too humble! It may be, indeed, that there isn't a complete off-the-shelf open-audit system ready to go today. That said, if you read Felten's column, I think you get the impression that there isn't even anything on the horizon. That seems misleading to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found you VoteHere folks to be far too humble! It may be, indeed, that there isn&#8217;t a complete off-the-shelf open-audit system ready to go today. That said, if you read Felten&#8217;s column, I think you get the impression that there isn&#8217;t even anything on the horizon. That seems misleading to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Hanchrow</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/#comment-8222</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Hanchrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 06:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2006/12/12/felten-on-voting/#comment-8222</guid>
		<description>I work with Andy Neff, but I think what Ed said is right: "[software independence]in practice requires [voting machines] to have some kind of paper trail".  Obviously we'd like to see our solution widely available, but the truth is that _in practice_ it, isn't, yet; nor are similar systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with Andy Neff, but I think what Ed said is right: &#8220;[software independence]in practice requires [voting machines] to have some kind of paper trail&#8221;.  Obviously we&#8217;d like to see our solution widely available, but the truth is that _in practice_ it, isn&#8217;t, yet; nor are similar systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
