<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Competitive Advantage: Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/</link>
	<description>security, privacy, transparency.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benlog &#187; Putting the &#8220;End&#8221; in EndNote.</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-406455</link>
		<dc:creator>Benlog &#187; Putting the &#8220;End&#8221; in EndNote.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-406455</guid>
		<description>[...] apparently that&#8217;s not okay with Thomson Reuters, the makers of EndNote. Danny Weitzner explains:  The latest beta release of Zotero will read and write EndNote’s proprietary metadata format. In [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] apparently that&#8217;s not okay with Thomson Reuters, the makers of EndNote. Danny Weitzner explains:  The latest beta release of Zotero will read and write EndNote’s proprietary metadata format. In [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benlog &#187; Google, the Desktop, and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-23480</link>
		<dc:creator>Benlog &#187; Google, the Desktop, and Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-23480</guid>
		<description>[...] Desktop for Mac, and that got me thinking again about the Google and Privacy issue I wrote about here and here. I said that Microsoft might have an interesting privacy advantage, because your data [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Desktop for Mac, and that got me thinking again about the Google and Privacy issue I wrote about here and here. I said that Microsoft might have an interesting privacy advantage, because your data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benlog &#187; Google &#38; Privacy</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-16302</link>
		<dc:creator>Benlog &#187; Google &#38; Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 14:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-16302</guid>
		<description>[...] a notable improvement in their privacy practices, which reinforces the opinion I expressed in a post a few days ago. Could it be that Google is starting to feel consumer demand for privacy? I think it&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a notable improvement in their privacy practices, which reinforces the opinion I expressed in a post a few days ago. Could it be that Google is starting to feel consumer demand for privacy? I think it&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-16114</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-16114</guid>
		<description>I think Google doesn&#039;t provide much in terms of privacy assurances. Few people have been horribly burned so far, but that will likely change as businesses start using Google Apps, etc... There is certainly a lack of awareness of the privacy issues regarding storing your data at a service provider, you&#039;re right. But that awareness may go up significantly as soon as there a few bad cases.

I&#039;m less worried about data in transit than I am about data stored on hard drives, backups, etc.... But of course that doesn&#039;t mean one should be careless about data in transit, you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google doesn&#8217;t provide much in terms of privacy assurances. Few people have been horribly burned so far, but that will likely change as businesses start using Google Apps, etc&#8230; There is certainly a lack of awareness of the privacy issues regarding storing your data at a service provider, you&#8217;re right. But that awareness may go up significantly as soon as there a few bad cases.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m less worried about data in transit than I am about data stored on hard drives, backups, etc&#8230;. But of course that doesn&#8217;t mean one should be careless about data in transit, you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-631914</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-631914</guid>
		<description>I think Google doesn&#039;t provide much in terms of privacy assurances. Few people have been horribly burned so far, but that will likely change as businesses start using Google Apps, etc... There is certainly a lack of awareness of the privacy issues regarding storing your data at a service provider, you&#039;re right. But that awareness may go up significantly as soon as there a few bad cases.

I&#039;m less worried about data in transit than I am about data stored on hard drives, backups, etc.... But of course that doesn&#039;t mean one should be careless about data in transit, you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google doesn&#8217;t provide much in terms of privacy assurances. Few people have been horribly burned so far, but that will likely change as businesses start using Google Apps, etc&#8230; There is certainly a lack of awareness of the privacy issues regarding storing your data at a service provider, you&#8217;re right. But that awareness may go up significantly as soon as there a few bad cases.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m less worried about data in transit than I am about data stored on hard drives, backups, etc&#8230;. But of course that doesn&#8217;t mean one should be careless about data in transit, you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-15890</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-15890</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this as a significant advantage. The average consumer is not concerned by this (and rightly so). Why? Because Google hasn&#039;t given them a reason not to trust them. Google provides various assurances (like no human reads your email - it&#039;s only accessible to programs - or something like that.) Unless you think Google is lying about that, most people are happy enough with that. And if you think you can&#039;t trust Google that much, you&#039;ll be out of luck using the Internet given your lack of control over your data as it hops about once it is off your host, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as a significant advantage. The average consumer is not concerned by this (and rightly so). Why? Because Google hasn&#8217;t given them a reason not to trust them. Google provides various assurances (like no human reads your email &#8211; it&#8217;s only accessible to programs &#8211; or something like that.) Unless you think Google is lying about that, most people are happy enough with that. And if you think you can&#8217;t trust Google that much, you&#8217;ll be out of luck using the Internet given your lack of control over your data as it hops about once it is off your host, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-631913</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-631913</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this as a significant advantage. The average consumer is not concerned by this (and rightly so). Why? Because Google hasn&#039;t given them a reason not to trust them. Google provides various assurances (like no human reads your email - it&#039;s only accessible to programs - or something like that.) Unless you think Google is lying about that, most people are happy enough with that. And if you think you can&#039;t trust Google that much, you&#039;ll be out of luck using the Internet given your lack of control over your data as it hops about once it is off your host, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as a significant advantage. The average consumer is not concerned by this (and rightly so). Why? Because Google hasn&#8217;t given them a reason not to trust them. Google provides various assurances (like no human reads your email &#8211; it&#8217;s only accessible to programs &#8211; or something like that.) Unless you think Google is lying about that, most people are happy enough with that. And if you think you can&#8217;t trust Google that much, you&#8217;ll be out of luck using the Internet given your lack of control over your data as it hops about once it is off your host, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ira Rubinstein on Microsoft&#8217;s Corporate Privacy Guidelines</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-15290</link>
		<dc:creator>John Palfrey &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ira Rubinstein on Microsoft&#8217;s Corporate Privacy Guidelines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 21:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/03/09/microsofts-competitive-advantage-privacy/#comment-15290</guid>
		<description>[...] of the conversation, prompted by JZ and Ben Adida, revolved around a lawyer&#8217;s problem: what happens after a subpoena arrives seeking personally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the conversation, prompted by JZ and Ben Adida, revolved around a lawyer&#8217;s problem: what happens after a subpoena arrives seeking personally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

