<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are you Kidding Me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/</link>
	<description>crypto applied to public policy</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: AllAboutVoting</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-97238</link>
		<dc:creator>AllAboutVoting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 00:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-97238</guid>
		<description>It's not even fair if all states did it.

See:
 http://fairvote.org/?page=1786&#38;articlemode=showspecific&#38;showarticle=2741</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not even fair if all states did it.</p>
<p>See:<br />
 <a href="http://fairvote.org/?page=1786&amp;articlemode=showspecific&amp;showarticle=2741" rel="nofollow">http://fairvote.org/?page=1786&amp;articlemode=showspecific&amp;showarticle=2741</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-96619</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 01:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-96619</guid>
		<description>Oliver: that idea is actually already out there: &lt;a href="http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;National Popular Vote&lt;/a&gt;. I fully support it. But I doubt that's what the Republican party has in mind here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver: that idea is actually already out there: <a href="http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/" rel="nofollow">National Popular Vote</a>. I fully support it. But I doubt that&#8217;s what the Republican party has in mind here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Roup</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-96330</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Roup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/08/21/are-you-kidding-me/#comment-96330</guid>
		<description>I feel like there's an opportunity here. If california passed this measure with wording that said the change only "turned on" once Texas and Florida pass similar rules, then we'd be getting somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like there&#8217;s an opportunity here. If california passed this measure with wording that said the change only &#8220;turned on&#8221; once Texas and Florida pass similar rules, then we&#8217;d be getting somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
