<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open(Social) Will Win ; and now Privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/</link>
	<description>security, privacy, transparency.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:03:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-153449</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/#comment-153449</guid>
		<description>Notice that I didn&#039;t say that Google had to win, but that OpenSocial would win. I suppose Facebook could create a competing OpenFBSocial, with a different API that others can adopt..... and maybe they would give OpenSocial a run for its money.

Now, if OpenSocial does get serious marketshare, the key interesting issue is what will Google do with it? I suspect some kind of easy pluggable API for ads, so they can hook into that whole world automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that I didn&#8217;t say that Google had to win, but that OpenSocial would win. I suppose Facebook could create a competing OpenFBSocial, with a different API that others can adopt&#8230;.. and maybe they would give OpenSocial a run for its money.</p>
<p>Now, if OpenSocial does get serious marketshare, the key interesting issue is what will Google do with it? I suspect some kind of easy pluggable API for ads, so they can hook into that whole world automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-631964</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/#comment-631964</guid>
		<description>Notice that I didn&#039;t say that Google had to win, but that OpenSocial would win. I suppose Facebook could create a competing OpenFBSocial, with a different API that others can adopt..... and maybe they would give OpenSocial a run for its money.

Now, if OpenSocial does get serious marketshare, the key interesting issue is what will Google do with it? I suspect some kind of easy pluggable API for ads, so they can hook into that whole world automatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that I didn&#8217;t say that Google had to win, but that OpenSocial would win. I suppose Facebook could create a competing OpenFBSocial, with a different API that others can adopt&#8230;.. and maybe they would give OpenSocial a run for its money.</p>
<p>Now, if OpenSocial does get serious marketshare, the key interesting issue is what will Google do with it? I suspect some kind of easy pluggable API for ads, so they can hook into that whole world automatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-152145</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/#comment-152145</guid>
		<description>Google doesn&#039;t have to win. 

If Facebook creates open user APIs (OpenFacebook), users can opt into offering private info to each application or systematically. 

It&#039;s a pretty straightforward &quot;mate&quot; to Google&#039;s &quot;check&quot; because it&#039;s an easy dev tweak and brings to bear Facebook&#039;s existing 50M users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t have to win. </p>
<p>If Facebook creates open user APIs (OpenFacebook), users can opt into offering private info to each application or systematically. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty straightforward &#8220;mate&#8221; to Google&#8217;s &#8220;check&#8221; because it&#8217;s an easy dev tweak and brings to bear Facebook&#8217;s existing 50M users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-631963</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/articles/2007/11/02/opensocial-will-win-and-now-privacy/#comment-631963</guid>
		<description>Google doesn&#039;t have to win. 

If Facebook creates open user APIs (OpenFacebook), users can opt into offering private info to each application or systematically. 

It&#039;s a pretty straightforward &quot;mate&quot; to Google&#039;s &quot;check&quot; because it&#039;s an easy dev tweak and brings to bear Facebook&#039;s existing 50M users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google doesn&#8217;t have to win. </p>
<p>If Facebook creates open user APIs (OpenFacebook), users can opt into offering private info to each application or systematically. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s a pretty straightforward &#8220;mate&#8221; to Google&#8217;s &#8220;check&#8221; because it&#8217;s an easy dev tweak and brings to bear Facebook&#8217;s existing 50M users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

