Benlog

security, privacy, transparency.

Archive for March, 2009

UCL Election Round 2: Speak Now or Forever Hold your Peace

Posted: Thursday, March 19th, 2009 @ 5:23 pm in uncategorized | No Comments »

The second round of the UCL Election just wrapped up. The cast votes have been recorded, and here are their fingerprints in PDF form. If you have a problem with the way the election was run, for example if you were a voter and the correct tracking number does not appear next to your voter [...]

Disturbing Apple Trends

Posted: Monday, March 16th, 2009 @ 11:06 pm in crypto, policy | 6 Comments »

I’ve long been an Apple fan. It is somewhat dissonant with my strong attachment to open-source/free software, but I’ve learned to live with it because I am significantly more productive on Mac OS than on Linux, and I still have to work with plenty of MS Office (and no, Open Office doesn’t cut it.) That [...]

Open-Audit Voting means a Single Vote Counts

Posted: Friday, March 6th, 2009 @ 1:03 pm in crypto, voting | 4 Comments »

After an incredibly long and busy week of work for my colleagues Olivier Pereira and Olivier de Marneffe, the UCL election, based on Helios, has been verified and tallied. The trustees arrived earlier today and successfully decrypted the result. Students each got approximately 1/10 of a vote, while Faculty got a full vote. 4000 people [...]

The Beautiful Magic of Cryptography

Posted: Wednesday, March 4th, 2009 @ 12:45 am in crypto, policy, press, voting | 2 Comments »

An election just wrapped up a few hours hours ago [public radio, le soir, RTL info]. The encrypted votes are stored in a redundant database, tied to each voter’s identifier, signed by the voting system, and available to all election participants for auditing. Each voter has a receipt of their encrypted vote they can compare [...]

Luis von Ahn: make academic reviews public

Posted: Sunday, March 1st, 2009 @ 5:36 pm in uncategorized | 2 Comments »

Yes! Luis von Ahn says that academic paper reviews should be public (they can remain anonymous.) I agree. I’d go further than Luis. For most computer science conferences, there is no feedback loop. Want to trash a paper? Write a really bad review and argue strongly, and if someone else on the program committee doesn’t [...]