<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal health record: it&#8217;s about the feedback loop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2009/04/20/personal-health-record-its-about-the-feedback-loop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/04/20/personal-health-record-its-about-the-feedback-loop/</link>
	<description>security, privacy, transparency.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/04/20/personal-health-record-its-about-the-feedback-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-532856</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=509#comment-532856</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dave, and thanks for your very thorough work on debugging this issue with John Halamka and the BIDMC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, and thanks for your very thorough work on debugging this issue with John Halamka and the BIDMC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-Patient Dave</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/04/20/personal-health-record-its-about-the-feedback-loop/comment-page-1/#comment-532795</link>
		<dc:creator>e-Patient Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=509#comment-532795</guid>
		<description>Congratulations! This is one of the most perceptive assessments of the situation that I&#039;ve seen! You&#039;re absolutely right about the need for vetting.

I posted an updated this morning with further findings on the errors we found in my record. http://is.gd/tnsD

It&#039;s my fervent hope that data quality professionals will be all over this issue, making lots of noise about how (a) this MUST be solved, and (b) it CAN be solved, despite protestations of some healthcare folks who say it&#039;s just too complicated.

We know it can be done. It&#039;ll take work, but as anyone who&#039;s been through it knows, you just gotta get started and work it through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations! This is one of the most perceptive assessments of the situation that I&#8217;ve seen! You&#8217;re absolutely right about the need for vetting.</p>
<p>I posted an updated this morning with further findings on the errors we found in my record. <a href="http://is.gd/tnsD" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/tnsD</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s my fervent hope that data quality professionals will be all over this issue, making lots of noise about how (a) this MUST be solved, and (b) it CAN be solved, despite protestations of some healthcare folks who say it&#8217;s just too complicated.</p>
<p>We know it can be done. It&#8217;ll take work, but as anyone who&#8217;s been through it knows, you just gotta get started and work it through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

