<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The erosion of our expectation of autonomy, and the Kindle Pledge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/</link>
	<description>security, privacy, transparency.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Taylor</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-578138</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=677#comment-578138</guid>
		<description>Property ownership is my central issue with &lt;acronym title=&quot;digital rights management&quot;&gt;DRM&lt;/acronym&gt; and connected devices. Owning a thing means it operates at my behest and nobody else&#039;s, but we routinely observe connected, software-driven and &lt;acronym title=&quot;digital rights management&quot;&gt;DRM&lt;/acronym&gt;-enabled objects obeying their manufacturers sooner than their individual, ostensible &lt;em&gt;owners&lt;/em&gt;.

Marketers of connected devices do so as if the devices were any other piece of personalty, but I believe they exist entirely in their own class. There is often a hidden, or at least much-downplayed mechanism that enables the vendor to remotely control or extract information from the product. This class of mechanism exists in electronic devices as diverse as &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_lock&quot; title=&quot;SIM lock - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mobile phones&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection&quot; title=&quot;High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;televisions&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fitbit.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FitBits&lt;/a&gt;. Some of these mechanisms are necessary for operation; many ultimately represent hidden costs to the consumer.

As science fiction author Bruce Sterling &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently noted&lt;/a&gt;, objects in the 21st century are &lt;q&gt;print-outs of social relationships&lt;/q&gt;. Perhaps connected devices more so than others. It is evident that consumers at large are inexperienced with the nature of this new kind of relationship, and lack the wherewithal to properly evaluate what is tantamount to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_and_switch&quot; title=&quot;Bait and switch - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bait and switch&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Property ownership is my central issue with <acronym title="digital rights management">DRM</acronym> and connected devices. Owning a thing means it operates at my behest and nobody else&#8217;s, but we routinely observe connected, software-driven and <acronym title="digital rights management">DRM</acronym>-enabled objects obeying their manufacturers sooner than their individual, ostensible <em>owners</em>.</p>
<p>Marketers of connected devices do so as if the devices were any other piece of personalty, but I believe they exist entirely in their own class. There is often a hidden, or at least much-downplayed mechanism that enables the vendor to remotely control or extract information from the product. This class of mechanism exists in electronic devices as diverse as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_lock" title="SIM lock - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">mobile phones</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection" title="High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">televisions</a> and <a href="http://www.fitbit.com/" rel="nofollow">FitBits</a>. Some of these mechanisms are necessary for operation; many ultimately represent hidden costs to the consumer.</p>
<p>As science fiction author Bruce Sterling <a href="http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11" rel="nofollow">recently noted</a>, objects in the 21st century are <q>print-outs of social relationships</q>. Perhaps connected devices more so than others. It is evident that consumers at large are inexperienced with the nature of this new kind of relationship, and lack the wherewithal to properly evaluate what is tantamount to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_and_switch" title="Bait and switch - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">bait and switch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorian Taylor</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-632077</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorian Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=677#comment-632077</guid>
		<description>Property ownership is my central issue with &lt;acronym title=&quot;digital rights management&quot;&gt;DRM&lt;/acronym&gt; and connected devices. Owning a thing means it operates at my behest and nobody else&#039;s, but we routinely observe connected, software-driven and &lt;acronym title=&quot;digital rights management&quot;&gt;DRM&lt;/acronym&gt;-enabled objects obeying their manufacturers sooner than their individual, ostensible &lt;em&gt;owners&lt;/em&gt;.

Marketers of connected devices do so as if the devices were any other piece of personalty, but I believe they exist entirely in their own class. There is often a hidden, or at least much-downplayed mechanism that enables the vendor to remotely control or extract information from the product. This class of mechanism exists in electronic devices as diverse as &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_lock&quot; title=&quot;SIM lock - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mobile phones&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection&quot; title=&quot;High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;televisions&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fitbit.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FitBits&lt;/a&gt;. Some of these mechanisms are necessary for operation; many ultimately represent hidden costs to the consumer.

As science fiction author Bruce Sterling &lt;a href=&quot;http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently noted&lt;/a&gt;, objects in the 21st century are &lt;q&gt;print-outs of social relationships&lt;/q&gt;. Perhaps connected devices more so than others. It is evident that consumers at large are inexperienced with the nature of this new kind of relationship, and lack the wherewithal to properly evaluate what is tantamount to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_and_switch&quot; title=&quot;Bait and switch - Wikipedia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bait and switch&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Property ownership is my central issue with <acronym title="digital rights management">DRM</acronym> and connected devices. Owning a thing means it operates at my behest and nobody else&#8217;s, but we routinely observe connected, software-driven and <acronym title="digital rights management">DRM</acronym>-enabled objects obeying their manufacturers sooner than their individual, ostensible <em>owners</em>.</p>
<p>Marketers of connected devices do so as if the devices were any other piece of personalty, but I believe they exist entirely in their own class. There is often a hidden, or at least much-downplayed mechanism that enables the vendor to remotely control or extract information from the product. This class of mechanism exists in electronic devices as diverse as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_lock" title="SIM lock - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">mobile phones</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-bandwidth_Digital_Content_Protection" title="High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">televisions</a> and <a href="http://www.fitbit.com/" rel="nofollow">FitBits</a>. Some of these mechanisms are necessary for operation; many ultimately represent hidden costs to the consumer.</p>
<p>As science fiction author Bruce Sterling <a href="http://video.reboot.dk/video/486788/bruce-sterling-reboot-11" rel="nofollow">recently noted</a>, objects in the 21st century are <q>print-outs of social relationships</q>. Perhaps connected devices more so than others. It is evident that consumers at large are inexperienced with the nature of this new kind of relationship, and lack the wherewithal to properly evaluate what is tantamount to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait_and_switch" title="Bait and switch - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow">bait and switch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks Essex</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-578119</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks Essex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=677#comment-578119</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take the Kindle pledge particularly because I can&#039;t not take the pledge, along with everyone else living outside of Fort USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take the Kindle pledge particularly because I can&#8217;t not take the pledge, along with everyone else living outside of Fort USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleks Essex</title>
		<link>http://benlog.com/articles/2009/07/21/the-erosion-of-our-expectation-of-autonomy-and-the-kindle-pledge/comment-page-1/#comment-632076</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleks Essex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benlog.com/?p=677#comment-632076</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take the Kindle pledge particularly because I can&#039;t not take the pledge, along with everyone else living outside of Fort USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take the Kindle pledge particularly because I can&#8217;t not take the pledge, along with everyone else living outside of Fort USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

