Yes! Luis von Ahn says that academic paper reviews should be public (they can remain anonymous.) I agree.
I’d go further than Luis. For most computer science conferences, there is no feedback loop. Want to trash a paper? Write a really bad review and argue strongly, and if someone else on the program committee doesn’t want to fight you, then the paper goes into the trash bin and that’s the end of that. If authors had the right to respond and to point out shoddy review work, it might make reviewers think twice about doing a poor job. As Luis points out, if we had a ranking of the reviewers and not just of the submitters, the quality of reviewing might improve over time.